Unlawful Sanctions | Work Programme Search | Work Programme Providers | Refuse the Work Programme | Jobseeker Charter

housing benefit

Work Programme ‘in Dire Straits’.

Posted by Andrew Coates | Posted in Government, housing benefit, Liberal Tory Coalition, Welfare Reform, Welfare State, Work Programme | Posted on 08-01-2012

Tags: , , ,

The reality of the work programme, which Worky here, and many of our valued posters, began to describe some months ago, is now making the national press.

Polly Toynbee writes in the Guardian on Saturday,

IDS’s other big idea, the Work Programme, is already in dire straits as contractors and charities can’t get enough people into non-existent jobs – unless they cheat or demand lots more money.

Here.

It’s worth reading the article in full.

It describes the mess that everything from the new universal credit system will create, the effects of the changes in disability benefits,  the abolition of the social fund, putting council tax benefit at the mercy of local councils, to the misery housing benefit reform will create.

Toynbee asks why Labour is not putting up a fight against this.

We think that it will expand and create a Victorian underclass, dependent, if they can get it, on charity.

She says,

“Shadow ministers should roll up their sleeves and demolish a plethora of similarly disastrous policies.”

 


Government May End Benefit Link to Inflation.

Posted by Andrew Coates | Posted in Cuts, Government, housing benefit, Incapacity Benefit, unemployment, welfare benefits, Welfare Reform | Posted on 04-11-2011

Tags: , , ,

In the Guardian Today – a new threat.

George Osborne has instructed Treasury officials to draw up proposals to scrap inflation-linked rises for benefits, although he is unlikely to make any changes for next year.

Here.

 

So now we know the context of then anti-benefit claimants campaign.


Unemployed to Stay Homeless.

Posted by Andrew Coates | Posted in Cuts, Housing, housing benefit, Liberal Tory Coalition, unemployment | Posted on 29-09-2011

Tags: , , ,

The Daily Telegraph reports – here ,

“People who are employed or are actively seeking work will take priority, ministers are to announce.

In a major shift in policy, Coalition ministers want to stop those who are hard-working being disadvantaged when social housing is allocated.

The move was attacked by campaigners last night for threatening the vulnerable. But it comes just days after Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, proposed giving council housing to those who deserve it rather than those who want “something for nothing” and do not put anything back into their communities.

Grant Shapps, the housing minister, said that he will present local authorities with a new “allocation policy” document. It will give much greater freedom to councils to decide who they put at the top of housing queues.

He said the present allocation policy guidance was too rigid and stacked against people who aspire and who work hard. Mr Shapps said: “Up until now, access to council housing has too often been blocked for hard-working families who do the right thing.

“When someone strives hard to hold down a job, I simply don’t see why this should count against them when it comes to their housing. That’s why I plan to change the system of allocating homes to allow councils to actively support those in work, as well as continuing their duty to look after the most vulnerable in society.”

Under the revised policy, someone who has a job and has held it for two years, would be given more points to rise up the housing queue. Those who are unemployed and show little inclination to find a job (how this can be proved we don’t know – AC) would drop down the queue.

It is the latest attempt by the Coalition to tackle what ministers believe is an acute unfairness in the way council housing is allocated. Mr Shapps has already announced that he intends to stop anyone earning more than £100,000   from staying in their council home unless they pay a proper market rent,   rather than a subsidised one.

Some councils are already trying to bring in the policy of rewarding those who   have jobs in a bid to bring down housing benefit bills.

In Manchester, people who volunteer (for what? AC)  or who work or have been good tenants in   the past are given priority in council housing allocation.

In London, Newham council is bringing in a similar scheme.

Westminster Council is following suit by prioritising those with jobs and   allowing them to leapfrog those who are unemployed, a system that was used   in the heyday of council housing in the 1950s.

Alastair Murray, deputy director for Housing Justice, said: “Our concern is   that housing is a basic human right and shouldn’t be contingent on someone’s   capacity to earn a living.

“Quite a lot of homeless people do work but the kind of work they are able to   do is quite unstable so they may not be eligible.

“There is a danger of stigmatising people who are already vulnerable.””

***********

You can’t help feeling that British politicians seem to be dreaming of a revival of the  days of ‘model workers’ housing, like Port Sunlight.

………………Dad comes home from a hard day’s work installing solar panels to tend a row of runner beans in his cottage garden. A golden retriever stands at his side.  Apple-cheeked Mum, fresh from her Call Centre, greets her well-scrubbed children, as they do homework for their Free School Business Studies course.  There is a well-deserved half pint of mild (2,9% alcohol) in the fridge, and 2 litres of Dutchy of Cornwell Dandelion and Burdock. As they sit down to the meal (selected from the ’5 a day’ portions of meat and veg)  together the family talk about the Community Project. Sponsored by Tesco and the Daily Express, they help out with the volunteers who’ve replaced the local Hospital Canteen staff. At that moment Emma Harrison drops in to see how they’re getting on……

This won’t bleeding happen. 

 

Update: Harpy on Attacks on the Unemployed – here.


Welfare State needs Responsibility

Posted by Work Programme | Posted in Department for Work and Pensions, DWP, European nationals, Fat Man on a Keyboard, housing benefit, human rights, income support, Ipswich Unemployed Action, Jenni Russell, Jobcentre, jobcentre Plus, jobseekers, jobseekers allowance, labour, London Metropolitan University, poverty, pregnant, Shiraz Socialist, The Labour Party and Conservative Party are fucking shit, Welfare Reform, Welfare State | Posted on 11-05-2011

Tags: , , ,

The Work Programme Network is reposting this old article from Flexible New Deal Scandal before the old site is pulled. I find it absolutely disgusting how DWP staff, management and politicians are all exempt from any blame when it comes to benefit entitlement decisions. Today comes the real life scenario of the DWP who turn [...]

Third National Day of Protest Against Benefit Cuts

Posted by Work Programme | Posted in a4e, Atos Origin, benefit protests, Black Triangle Anti-Defamation Campaign, Brighton Benefits Campaign, Cardiffs Unemployed Daytime Disco, Carer Watch, Crippen – Disabled Cartoonist, Diary of a Benefit Scrounger, Disabled People Against Cuts, DLA, Dundee Unemployed Workers, DWP, esa, Free London Listings, Goldsmiths in Occupation, Haringey Solidarity Group, housing benefit, Ipswich Unemployed Action, Islington Poverty Action, Kilburn Unemployed Workers Group, Lancaster and Morecambe Against the Cuts, London Coalition Against Poverty, London Foodbank, Mad Pride, Medway Against Cuts, Mental Health Resistance Network, National Day of Protest Against Benefit Cuts, Norfolk Community Action Group, Nottingham Claimants Union, Nuneaton Against Benefit Cuts, Oxford Save Our Services, Squattastic, Tyneside Claimants Union, Welfare Action Hackney, Welfare Reform, Welfare Rights 4 u, Work Programme Network, Workfare, World Homeless Day | Posted on 30-03-2011

Tags: , , ,

The 3rd National Day of Protest Against Benefit Cuts has been called for April 14th 2011. Millions are set to be affected by savage cuts to housing, disability, sickness and welfare benefits. People with disabilities, illness, the unemployed, single parents, carers the low waged, part time students, volunteers, homeless people and college students are all [...]


Wordpress.com blogs for 'housing benefit'

Ipswich Unemployed Action comments...

  • Comment on Workfare workers are employees of the Crown? by Scouser
    local poundland has a junkie geezer on the door - got "workfare" written all over his slashed up face.
  • Comment on Brighton Campaign Victory On Poundland Workfare Placements. by Work Programme
    <blockquote>Within a short time a whole group of Poundland employees were standing just inside the doors either joining in or listening as we explained how exploitation of the unemployed as free labour is an attack on those in work as well as those without, and that all work should be properly paid.</blockquote> How do you know they aren't workfare slaves?!
  • Comment on Why did Waterstones end workfare at its stores? by Wayne green
    Would just like to say wel done on the action u took at brighton poundland . Could I just suggest that u write to all the top insurance companys and explain that all them that are unemployed are being forced to go and do the free labour as I dont belive that they understand thats the case and belive that we are all volunteers and we aint we being forced .i was forced to do free labour at local football club when I asked who was insuring me to be there as im being forced to be here the guy said I phone our insurance company and they said no im not insured due to am not an employee aint a volunteer or any way involved with said placment also no health and saftey was given there they are breaking the law as everybody that takes up work by law should have a test and by somebody thats fully quilified in health and saftey not just who u see on day one they breaking the law not doing it .i say if more people that are forced to do unpaid work MAKE SURE U SEE OR GET THEM TO RING INSURANCE COMPANY IN FRONT U TO MAKE SURE U INSURED AND TO DEMAND TO SEE THAT THE PERSON WHO IF U LUCKY ENOUGH TO HAVE A HEALTH AND SAFTEY THAT THEY ARE QUILIFIED TO GIVE U A HEALTH AND SAFTEY AS ONLY THOSE IN LAW CAN DO THIS ALSO JOIN A UNION COST 81P A WK THAT WAY U WIL HAVE SUM BODY ON YOUR SIDE TO FIGHT YOUR CORNER . Also when u finish your free labour u should make out a bill to said employer for work rendered and if dont pay take to small claims court 99. 999 of the time the employer wil not turn up to court ending in u winning the case as they dont want the bad publicity to affect there business .
  • Comment on Workfare workers are employees of the Crown? by Tobanem
    The latest major threat to Trade Unions is the tory-led TURC campaign. It means Trade Union Reform Campaign - which means the Tories want to outlaw the Unions! There might not be any Trade Unions left if TURC triumphs! Even if Trade Unions survive the TURC attack, I don't see much point in unemployed people joining a trade union when some unions are advocating Workfare! Not much unity in that, is there? Back in the Thatcher era, the Unions scuppered the "training" schemes for the unemployed by vigorously demanding these schemes be "surplus to requirements" - so as not to threaten the employment prospects of existing union members. Nowadays, it should be up to the unions and their current gainfully employed members whose future pay and conditions will be inevitably threatened by Workfare schemes to take a firm stand against the increasing use of wageless Workfare by a desperate Government as a cheap solution to unemployment. If Trade Unions allow Workfare into the workplace in the first place, any unemployed person joining a union under these conditions will be akin to bolting the barn door after the horse has bolted.
  • Comment on Workfare workers are employees of the Crown? by Mr No
    I'm personally a little sceptical about joining any club, be it a union or otherwise. Will they represent the average joe public alleged 'scrounger' when they are exploited for whatever period the dwp lets the provider deem a suitable punitive measure? In theory, but what about the practice? It's almost too big an issue. Join the union, they can see that this is one big scam, right? And they'll throw everything they've got at it for the few (yes, few) who stumped up a few quid? Maybe? And maybe I'm seeing this all wrong. They just speak up, raise awareness a little. Make noises? Are they what they used to be? I must take time to study. I've never had a direct enough experience of unions to really make any bold claims about such. This is simply my somewhat currently naive thoughts. A union can represent its members and have a knock on effect for the rest if they indeed can make much of a positive difference in todays rather bizarre climate. All the unions have probably had their true powers corrupted by corrupt power, they're probably told where their line is. Cynical perhaps? Truly hope so! Just my own instincts tell me it's a nice idea, maybe worth it? But at the end of the day my unemployment and the issues it may cause me, really has to be dealt with by me! Me, at the sharp end. On this side of the desk, having to duel with language with whoever is on that side of the desk. Having to watch every damn (and potentially damning!) word that may spill forth from my gob. Having to put up with all the bullshit, just to survive. And that's when you aren't doing anything wrong! An actual genuine claimant, doing ones best, but just doesn't like being treated like shit. Gosh, really? Yeah! Really. For the right wing readers... Yes, that's simply our issue. Simply! If only! My f**king mantra is going to be 'there are no f**king jobs!' Of course, one will leave out the swearing. However tempting. And before they even utter 'There are plenty of jobs out there and I simply must be doing something wrong', obviously because I am deemed as thick as shit by some moron adviser, I will swiftly add to 'there are no jobs' a rather honest and plausible 'that are suitable for me'. My f**king terms! Crown employee or state slave? I don't care. I'm me. Doing what's right. But unless you are a stubborn b*stard who doesn't take sh*t then stay calm, do your best. I cannot really afford 81p a day, nor 50p for the other union. Or did I imagine the other one? Hmmm? Take care people. Just 'aving a late night ramble.
  • Comment on Workfare workers are employees of the Crown? by Luther
    Don't think I'll be giving any money to Unison whilst they fund a Labour party that supports workfare. We need our own union.
  • Comment on Workfare workers are employees of the Crown? by workethic89
    Reblogged this on <a href="http://workethic89.wordpress.com/2012/02/06/45/" rel="nofollow">Brighter Future</a> and commented: Very good information RE Work Experience, Manditory Work Activity and the Work Programme.
  • Comment on Workfare workers are employees of the Crown? by ariversideview
    As a Union hating Tory I agree with this post and I think that regestering with Unison for your 6 month stint of work activity is a good idea. Also as these companies don't need to fill the vacancies filled by those on Work Activity and Work Experience schemes they are being subsidised by the state. Why should the state be subsidusing multnational companies?
  • Comment on Boycott Work Programme. by The Guardian
    Top five regrets of the dying A nurse has recorded the most common regrets of the dying, and among the top ones is <b>'I wish I hadn't worked so hard'</b>. What would your biggest regret be if this was your last day of life? There was no mention of more sex or bungee jumps. A palliative nurse who has counselled the dying in their last days has revealed the most common regrets we have at the end of our lives. And among the top, from men in particular, is 'I wish I hadn't worked so hard'. Bronnie Ware is an Australian nurse who spent several years working in palliative care, caring for patients in the last 12 weeks of their lives. She recorded their dying epiphanies in a blog called Inspiration and Chai, which gathered so much attention that she put her observations into a book called The Top Five Regrets of the Dying. Ware writes of the phenomenal clarity of vision that people gain at the end of their lives, and how we might learn from their wisdom. "When questioned about any regrets they had or anything they would do differently," she says, "common themes surfaced again and again." Here are the top five regrets of the dying, as witnessed by Ware: 1. I wish I'd had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me. "This was the most common regret of all. When people realise that their life is almost over and look back clearly on it, it is easy to see how many dreams have gone unfulfilled. Most people had not honoured even a half of their dreams and had to die knowing that it was due to choices they had made, or not made. Health brings a freedom very few realise, until they no longer have it." <b>2. I wish I hadn't worked so hard. "This came from every male patient that I nursed. They missed their children's youth and their partner's companionship. Women also spoke of this regret, but as most were from an older generation, many of the female patients had not been breadwinners. All of the men I nursed deeply regretted spending so much of their lives on the treadmill of a work existence."</b> 3. I wish I'd had the courage to express my feelings. "Many people suppressed their feelings in order to keep peace with others. As a result, they settled for a mediocre existence and never became who they were truly capable of becoming. Many developed illnesses relating to the bitterness and resentment they carried as a result." 4. I wish I had stayed in touch with my friends. "Often they would not truly realise the full benefits of old friends until their dying weeks and it was not always possible to track them down. Many had become so caught up in their own lives that they had let golden friendships slip by over the years. There were many deep regrets about not giving friendships the time and effort that they deserved. Everyone misses their friends when they are dying." 5. I wish that I had let myself be happier. "This is a surprisingly common one. Many did not realise until the end that happiness is a choice. They had stayed stuck in old patterns and habits. The so-called 'comfort' of familiarity overflowed into their emotions, as well as their physical lives. Fear of change had them pretending to others, and to their selves, that they were content, when deep within, they longed to laugh properly and have silliness in their life again." Full article <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2012/feb/01/top-five-regrets-of-the-dying" rel="nofollow">here</a> .
  • Comment on Cait Reilly, ‘What a Snooty So-and-So” says Ian Duncan Smith. by Wayne green
    In reply to andrew coates . There aint one immagrant on the work programme that im on and excuse me I speak 4 many people who say why the fuck do they have a council house and we ave lived here all our life and aint got one . And yes send em home then there be work for us english and stop free labour then employers would have to take paid labour , I take it that u so far up immagrants arses u must be married to one of them c--ts

RSS Work Programme Network

  • Top 50 UK Training Companies 2011
    1: Babcock International 2: A4e * 3: Learndirect (UFI)* 4: Kaplan 5: BPP 6: QA 7: ESG Group* (Sheffield Trainers Ltd, Sencia, Triangle Training, Orient Gold, Platinum Training) 8: JHP Group* 9: Pearson in Practice 10: Aviation Training International 11... […]
  • Mandatory Work Activity is slavery: lawyers mount legal challenge
    Public Interest Lawyers have launched a legal challenge of the Government’s Mandatory Work Activity scheme arguing that it amounts to unlawful forced labour. If this succeeds, the outcome could also apply to the Community Action Programme and the... […]