Unlawful Sanctions | Work Programme Search | Work Programme Providers | Refuse the Work Programme | Jobseeker Charter

Department for Work and Pensions

Cait Reilly Forced Labour Case Goes Forward.

Posted by Andrew Coates | Posted in Campaigns for Unemployed, Cuts, Department for Work and Pensions, poundland, Public Interest Lawyers, Welfare Reform, Welfare State, Work Programme, Workfare | Posted on 13-01-2012

Tags: , , ,

Museum volunteer told to work unpaid at Poundland

By Kaye Wiggins, Third Sector Online, 12 January 2012

Cait Reilly [David Sillitoe/Guardian]Cait Reilly [David Sillitoe/Guardian]

Cait Reilly was told she otherwise would lose her Jobseeker’s Allowance

A university graduate was told she had to stop volunteering at a local museum for four weeks and do unpaid work in a Poundland store in order to continue receiving Jobseeker’s Allowance.

Cait Reilly, who graduated from Birmingham University in 2010, was regularly volunteering part-time at the Pen Museum & Learning Centre in Birmingham because she hoped to pursue a career in museums.

But last autumn she was told by her local Jobcentre Plus that she had been placed on a “sector-based work academy”, a four-week programme made up of two weeks’ employability training and two weeks’ unpaid work at Poundland.

Reilly has this week launched proceedings to seek a judicial review of the Jobseeker’s Allowance (Employment, Skills and Enterprise Scheme) Regulations 2011, which include a power to compel JSA claimants to carry out work.

Her solicitor, Jim Duffy of Public Interest Lawyers, said Reilly had been volunteering at the museum since May. He said she was placed on the work academy programme by her local Jobcentre Plus and agreed to do it after being told about the scheme in “vague and inaccurate terms”.

Duffy said when Reilly found out more about the programme, she told staff at the Jobcentre Plus that she did not want to take part, but was told that it was mandatory. She did the Poundland placement in November.

Brian Jones, another volunteer at the Pen Museum, a registered charity, said Reilly was not able to give much notice that she would have to stop her work for a month. “She is a valued volunteer here, so to lose her in that period was very difficult for us,” he said.

A spokeswoman for the Department for Work and Pensions said: “Working in retail is perfectly good experience for a career in a museum. There are very similar transferable skills involved.”

Here.

Comment.

The Daily Mail seems to think that working for your dole in Poundland is a good idea.

Someone calling herself Dominique Jackson writes, “We should be grateful that Poundland has signed up to the scheme to provide work placements, training and a guaranteed interview for kids trying to improve their employability.” (Here)

I suppose anyone under 25, who gets a reduced JSA, is a “kid”.

To be treated as such.

The idea that Poundland have found a nice little earner – getting workers for free – seems to have escaped her attention.

Or that it is indeed a human right to be able to choose your job.

As in, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,

Article 23

  1. Everyone has the right to work, to free choice  of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. (Here)

Naturally for those who want to see the unemployed forced to clean the streets (and why not with Toothbrushes – there was a Pilot Scheme in Vienna in the late 1930s) this right does not exist.

On the Background to Workfare and details of how Private Companies, Local Government, the Third Sector and Charities are going to exploit this Harpy Marx is highly recommended – here.


Welfare State needs Responsibility

Posted by Work Programme | Posted in Department for Work and Pensions, DWP, European nationals, Fat Man on a Keyboard, housing benefit, human rights, income support, Ipswich Unemployed Action, Jenni Russell, Jobcentre, jobcentre Plus, jobseekers, jobseekers allowance, labour, London Metropolitan University, poverty, pregnant, Shiraz Socialist, The Labour Party and Conservative Party are fucking shit, Welfare Reform, Welfare State | Posted on 11-05-2011

Tags: , , ,

The Work Programme Network is reposting this old article from Flexible New Deal Scandal before the old site is pulled. I find it absolutely disgusting how DWP staff, management and politicians are all exempt from any blame when it comes to benefit entitlement decisions. Today comes the real life scenario of the DWP who turn [...]

Lockheed Martin Census 2011

Posted by Work Programme | Posted in Administration of Justice Act 1970, Census 2011, census 2011 conditional acceptance document, census 2011 conditional acceptance letter, CIA, Communications Act 2003, ConDem(n) Government, conditional acceptance document, conditional acceptance letter, Criminal Records Bureau, Data Protection Act 1998, Department for Work and Pensions, FBI, GCHQ, hmrc, Home Office Borders and Immigration Agency, Information Commissioner, Lockheed Martin, Lockheed Martin Census 2011, Lockheed Martin UK, MI5, MI6, Office for National Statistics, Office of Fair Trading, Protection from Harassment Act 1997, Serious Organised Crime Agency, Statement of Truth, Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007, The Occupier, Trading Standards, UK Data Capture Limited, US Patriot Act, Wireless Telegraphy Act | Posted on 19-03-2011

Tags: , , ,

Of course there is much controversy around the 2011 Census. Some people are boycotting the Census 2011 due to Lockheed Martin running it in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. We are publishing an conditional acceptance letter.As originally posted by starlightuk on TPUC, starbuck25 from TPUC has an alternative letter. (*recommended links*) In Care Of: House/Number, [...]

DWP first class and second class postal costs 2008-2010

Posted by Work Programme | Posted in Department for Work and Pensions | Posted on 27-01-2011

2008/09

2009/10

1st class Volume

1st class £

2nd class Volume

2nd class £

1st class Volume

1st class £

2nd class Volume

2nd class £

70,999,339

£24,139,775

22,380,728

£5,371,375

73,217,506

£26,358,302

18,749,556

£4,687,389

Proven UK Benefit Fraud: Shy of the £1.5 billion allegation mark

Posted by Work Programme | Posted in benefit fraud, benefit thieves, beneft fraudsters, con-servatives, ConDem, ConDem(n) Government, Deception towards Jobcentre Plus, Department for Work and Pensions, Disability Living Allowance, Disabled Benefits, DWP, FRAIMS, Fraud Referral and Intervention Management System, fraudulent activity, Government, housing benefit, JCP, jobcentre Plus, jobseekers allowance, jsa, social security, Social Security and Child Support, The Labour Party and Conservative Party are fucking shit, uk economy, uk government, unemployment, wasting taxpayers money, Welfare Fraud, Welfare State | Posted on 04-09-2010

Tags: , ,

A Freedom of Information Act request has returned that in the 2009/10 tax year, the Department for Work and PensionsFraud Referral and Intervention Management System: a system designed to record all allegations of Benefit Fraud had uncovered just £143.7 million of proven benefit fraud.

Actually, that is one hell of a lot of money! However, the figure quoted for benefit fraud in the UK is £1.5 billion… the “proven” figures are just under a tenth. Does 90p in every pound of fraud in the benefit system goes unnoticed? Seems a bit steep to me! To put it another way, the FRAIMS (tongue-in-cheek of “frame” – what it stands for came after…) system cost around £65 million to the taxpayer which is approx 45% of the discovered fraud in the last tax year.

How can the Government be so sure that £1.5 billion is the figure of fraud when even after spending goodness knows how many millions on advertising to counter fraud, they have only recently unearthed £143.7 million?

In all honestly, (I am not trying to defend these greedy bastards who steal and defraud us all… but) how does the Government know how much money is lost to fraud? Logically thinking, the only explanation is the system is aware of whom is stealing and the particulars of such; however, cannot prosecute or reclaim such money due to lack of resources.

I find that absolutely bullshit. To be able to assign £65 million and the cost of the benefit fraud advertisements from the treasury, shows a lot about the willingness of using resources to counter the problem. Of course, neither of this is about the thousands of investigators and benefit fraud hotline staff working… the resources seem to be there.

Actually, it is probably some pie-in-the-sky nonsense… If we catch 2,000 benefit cheats… there must be 50,000 out there… so if £150 million is the cost of fraud we know of, lets say a combined total of £1.5 billion.

What really is concerning is, add official error to the pile and the £1.5 billion figure peaks above £5 billion.

The Government seriously needs to get a grip over the finances… axing services is not the way. If £5 billion is fraud and error; lets total up the wasted time cost of places like Jobcentre Plus, the OTT security, NHS purchasing products more expensive than private businesses like BUPA, the welfare cheques going abroad including DLA payments to over 2000 claimants who don’t even live in the UK,  the cost of EU membership etc … at the end we are probably looking at £50 billion. Good job I don’t have a shot gun after hearing that depressing news!


Wordpress.com blogs for 'Department for Work and Pensions'

Ipswich Unemployed Action comments...

  • Comment on Work Programme in Disarray: Up the Ante! by Wayne green
    Am flabbegasted that the big work programme consist's of you going once a wk from minute you walk in to minute you walk out half hour latter you get no contact with a work programme provider apart from them making sure you sign their attendance book and thats only so they can get paid if sitting you in front of a computer half hour a week looking on web sites at jobs that dont change from one month or the next or looking at dwp site at jobs that are made up and never was a real paid job then god help us and the sum thing for nothing excuse me its what we have payed in to the system when we was working that we are getting paid with in fact we are paying our self's with our own money by rights, only people getting sum thing for nothing is the likes of tesco and the rest that take free labour and of course emma harrison and all the other work programme providers that are getting paid what for they dont give us any help to help us back into work so please drop the sum thing for nothing as its what we have paid in to system when we was working and only people to rob the tax payer is all the mp's who fiddled their exspenses and of couse emma and the other chums
  • Comment on Work Programme in Disarray: Up the Ante! by Noam Chomsky
    It is an imperative that you transform yourself from a consumer of the rich man’s bullshit, to a manufacturer of the people’s truth. – Noam Chomsky, <i>Manufacturing Consent</i>
  • Comment on Work Programme in Disarray: Up the Ante! by mrmrkrchrdson
    Regarding this letter, I'm no legal eagle - but do remember that in the McLibel case, the European Court of Human Rights criticised the UK for not adequately protecting individuals' rights to publicly criticise private companies, especially where the activities of the company affects people's lives. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_Case
  • Comment on Work Programme in Disarray: Up the Ante! by A4e Corruption
    In these recessionary times, we’re all very interested in unemployment. Newspapers and commentators pore over unemployment figures, whether they’re up or down and reflect on what this says about the state of our economy. But nobody seems to care much about the unemployed. Apart from Iain Duncan Smith, of course – or so he would have us believe. In a speech last May, in which he introduced his ideas for welfare reform, he announced, ‘We must be here to help improve people’s lives, not just park them on long-term benefits. Aspiration, it seems, is in danger of becoming the preserve of the wealthy’ One of the proposals in IDS’s welfare reforms which are currently being pushed through parliament is to involve more private companies in getting the unemployed back to work, who will then be paid for their successes. It’s hardly an original idea – Jobcentre Plus already has contracts with hundreds of such organisations (‘training providers’ they’re called in a classic example of New Labour-speak ) whereby claimants of Jobseekers Allowance are forced to attend ‘employability training’, which often involves little more than them being sat in a room with some newspapers and the Internet for 5 hours a day (if you care to search the web, there are a fair few ranting forums and blogs devoted to these places). The providers have various targets, for getting people into work or onto work placements, and they are paid according to their results. This was the New Labour version, so one can only assume that the Tory version is going to be even more wedded to free market dogma. I worked in the employability sector for a while in the mid-noughties and have friends who still do. I can say fairly confidently that it is run by a bunch of cowboys. A4E, one of the government’s largest private contractors, was investigated by the DWP in 2009 for fraudulent practices, including falsifying employer signatures. It was brushed off by A4E as an aberration, but it is symptomatic of the way that many such companies are run; I know of many cases, from my own and others’ experiences, in which signatures have been forged, paperwork falsified and evidence faked in order for targets to be met and money to be claimed from the Job Centre. One such instance involved a bewildered client being asked to pose for a photograph standing by a photocopier, only to find out later that this was being used as evidence of an office work placement that she had never done. These organisations treat their unemployed clients with contempt. People are regularly put on unpaid work placement schemes, usually with unglamourous high street outfits like Iceland or Poundstretcher, sometimes with the vague promise of a job at the end but just as often not, and expected to be grateful. One man I knew, a 50 year old from Sri Lanka, began a 2 week placement as a shelf filler at a high street chain on the understanding he would be offered a job at the end. The period was extended to 4 weeks and then to 6 weeks, at the end of which he had sustained a bad back injury from the heavy lifting and the offer of a job was withdrawn. 6 weeks of slave labour for a crappy minimum wage supermarket job that never materialised and which gave him a bad, possibly long term, back injury. Is this the kind of aspiration that IDS wants to see more of?
  • Comment on Work Programme in Disarray: Up the Ante! by A4e Corruption
    In these recessionary times, we're all very interested in unemployment. Newspapers and commentators pore over unemployment figures, whether they're up or down and reflect on what this says about the state of our economy. But nobody seems to care much about the unemployed. Apart from Iain Duncan Smith, of course - or so he would have us believe. In a speech last May, in which he introduced his ideas for welfare reform, he announced, 'We must be here to help improve people's lives, not just park them on long-term benefits. Aspiration, it seems, is in danger of becoming the preserve of the wealthy' One of the proposals in IDS's welfare reforms which are currently being pushed through parliament is to involve more private companies in getting the unemployed back to work, who will then be paid for their successes. It's hardly an original idea – Jobcentre Plus already has contracts with hundreds of such organisations ('training providers' they're called in a classic example of New Labour-speak ) whereby claimants of Jobseekers Allowance are forced to attend 'employability training', which often involves little more than them being sat in a room with some newspapers and the Internet for 5 hours a day (if you care to search the web, there are a fair few ranting forums and blogs devoted to these places). The providers have various targets, for getting people into work or onto work placements, and they are paid according to their results. This was the New Labour version, so one can only assume that the Tory version is going to be even more wedded to free market dogma. I worked in the employability sector for a while in the mid-noughties and have friends who still do. I can say fairly confidently that it is run by a bunch of cowboys. A4E, one of the government's largest private contractors, was investigated by the DWP in 2009 for fraudulent practices, including falsifying employer signatures. It was brushed off by A4E as an aberration, but it is symptomatic of the way that many such companies are run; I know of many cases, from my own and others' experiences, in which signatures have been forged, paperwork falsified and evidence faked in order for targets to be met and money to be claimed from the Job Centre. One such instance involved a bewildered client being asked to pose for a photograph standing by a photocopier, only to find out later that this was being used as evidence of an office work placement that she had never done.
  • Comment on Work Programme in Disarray: Up the Ante! by analiensaturn
    These organisations treat their unemployed clients with contempt. People are regularly put on unpaid work placement schemes, usually with unglamourous high street outfits like Iceland or Poundstretcher, sometimes with the vague promise of a job at the end but just as often not, and expected to be grateful. One man I knew, a 50 year old from Sri Lanka, began a 2 week placement as a shelf filler at a high street chain on the understanding he would be offered a job at the end. The period was extended to 4 weeks and then to 6 weeks, at the end of which he had sustained a bad back injury from the heavy lifting and the offer of a job was withdrawn. 6 weeks of slave labour for a crappy minimum wage supermarket job that never materialised and which gave him a bad, possibly long term, back injury. Is this the kind of aspiration that IDS wants to see more of?
  • Comment on Work Programme in Disarray: Up the Ante! by analiensaturn
    The government schemes are for those with a full brain and low morals to milk those with less mental skills for profit.I had dealing with similar organisations and know them as wolves.
  • Comment on Work Programme in Disarray: Up the Ante! by Wayne_Kerr
    https://twitter.com/#!/pha_digital
  • Comment on Work Programme in Disarray: Up the Ante! by Eli
    <a href="http://elibloglondon.blogspot.com/2012/02/welfare-to-work-gravy-train.html" rel="nofollow">Eli Blog</a> The Welfare to Work Gravy Train
  • Comment on Work Programme in Disarray: Up the Ante! by Eli
    <a href="http://elibloglondon.blogspot.com/2012/02/welfare-to-work-gravy-train.html" rel="nofollow">Eli Blog</a> Eli Blog

RSS Work Programme Network

  • Top 50 UK Training Companies 2011
    1: Babcock International 2: A4e * 3: Learndirect (UFI)* 4: Kaplan 5: BPP 6: QA 7: ESG Group* (Sheffield Trainers Ltd, Sencia, Triangle Training, Orient Gold, Platinum Training) 8: JHP Group* 9: Pearson in Practice 10: Aviation Training International 11... […]
  • Mandatory Work Activity is slavery: lawyers mount legal challenge
    Public Interest Lawyers have launched a legal challenge of the Government’s Mandatory Work Activity scheme arguing that it amounts to unlawful forced labour. If this succeeds, the outcome could also apply to the Community Action Programme and the... […]